Dorothy Parker said it best: "I hate writing but love having written."
The hating part is now underway.
I am doing a piece for Clemson University's science magazine, Glimpse, about how plants communicate.
Communicate?
With whom, or should I ask with what?
This is where it gets interesting.
I'm off to interview Julia Frugoli, who researches how plants send messages from "roots to shoots."
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Sunday, June 24, 2012
Thursday, March 29, 2012
Good dirt: It's health food now
From The Scientist Daily...
Let Them Eat Dirt
Early exposure to microbes shapes the mammalian immune system by subduing inflammatory T cells.
By Megan Scudellari | March 22, 2012
13 Comments
FLICKR, DAVID K.
Maybe it’s okay to let your toddler lick the swing set and kiss the dog. A new mouse study suggests early exposure to microbes is essential for normal immune development, supporting the so-called “hygiene hypothesis” which states that lack of such exposure leads to an increased risk of autoimmune diseases. Specifically, the study found that early-life microbe exposure decreases the number of inflammatory immune cells in the lungs and colon, lowering susceptibility to asthma and inflammatory bowel diseases later in life.
The finding, published today (March 21) in Science, may help explain why there has been a rise in autoimmune diseases in sterile, antibiotic-saturated developed countries.
“There have been many clues that environmental factors, particularly microbiota, play a role in disease risk, but there’s very little information about when it’s critical for that exposure to take place,” saidJonathan Braun, chair of pathology and laboratory medicine at the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, who was not involved in the research. “This is one of the most compelling observations to pin down that time frame.”
The mammalian immune system is dramatically influenced and shaped by exposure to microbes throughout life. Epidemiological evidence suggests that early-life exposure to bacteria may be key in preventing two immune diseases: asthma and ulcerative colitis, a type of inflammatory bowel disease.
To explore that link, Dennis Kasper, Richard Blumberg, and colleagues at Harvard Medical School examined susceptibility to both diseases in germ free mice and normal lab mice. “We were surprised to learn that germ free mice were extremely susceptible to both diseases,” said Kasper, “but normal, colonized mice were pretty resistant to both.” In an attempt to reverse the phenotype, the researchers colonized germ-free adults with microbes, but nothing changed: the mice remained susceptible to both diseases. Then the team colonized germ-free pregnant females just before giving birth, and found that their pups were protected against the diseases. The results suggest that it may be critical for mammals to be exposed to the right microbes quite early in life, said Kasper.
It is also known that natural killer T (NKT) cells—immune cells that detect antigens and produce large amounts of inflammatory cytokines—play some role in both diseases. To see if these cells were involved in the susceptibility patterns, the researchers counted NKT cells in germ free and normal lab mice. Normal mice had very low numbers of NKT cells in their lungs and colon, while germ-free mice had high numbers. And once again, colonizing adult germ free mice with microbes changed nothing: the mice’s NKT cell counts remained high, and the mice were still susceptible to both diseases. But when the team used antibodies to block NKT cell activation in young germ-free mice, effectively preventing NKT cells from ever getting a foothold, the mice were protected against the two diseases, suggesting the high NKT counts were at the root of their high susceptibility.
The researchers also identified a protein made by epithelial cells called CXCL16, whose increased expression accompanied increased NKT cell numbers. The more CXCL16 that was present, the higher the levels of NKT cells. It’s possible that bacteria in early life block the production of NKT cells by blocking CXCL16, Kasper suggested, but for now that remains a hypothesis.
“They’ve identified two key players—the epithelium and the NKT cells—but it immediately opens the question of whether other cell types are also involved,” said Braun.
Though Kasper is cautious to make generalizations about how the finding applies to humans, it does fit the “hygiene hypothesis,” he said, which proposes that the increasing occurrence of asthma and other inflammatory diseases in the developed world may be due to a reduced exposure to microbes early in life. But most importantly, future studies of human microbiota and the immune system should zero in on early childhood, he emphasized. “It’s quite important to focus on this early period.”
T. Olszak et al., “Microbial exposure during early life has persistent effects on natural killer T cell function,” Science, doi:10.1126/science.1219328, 2012.
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
NYT notes study on chocolate aids weight loss
March 26, 2012, 5:39 PM
The Chocolate Diet?
By ANAHAD O'CONNOR, ReporterRichard Perry/The New York Times
Chocolate may not be as hazardous to your waistline as you think — at least in moderation.
A new study shows that people who eat chocolate frequently have lower body mass indexes than those who eat it less often. The researchers could not explain precisely why something usually loaded with sugar, fat and calories would have a beneficial effect on weight. But they suspect that antioxidants and other compounds in chocolate may deliver a metabolic boost that can offset its caloric downside.
Chocoholics may know that in recent years chocolate has been linked to a growing list of health benefits. Studies have found, for example, that regularly eating chocolate may lower blood pressure and cardiovascular risk, andimprove cholesterol and insulin regulation.
Although the new study is among the first to look at chocolate’s effect on weight, the findings “are compatible with other evidence showing favorable metabolic effects that are known to track with body mass index,” said Dr. Beatrice A. Golomb, lead author of the study and an associate professor of medicine at the University of California, San Diego.
Dr. Golomb’s study, published in Archives of Internal Medicine and financed by the National Institutes of Health, involved roughly 1,000 adults. The researchers looked at data on how often they exercised, the amount and type of calories they ate — including a breakdown of the types of dietary fat they consumed — and how their health and weight related to their chocolate intake. On average, the subjects were middle-aged, exercised about three times a week and ate chocolate about twice a week. There was no breakdown of the kinds of chocolate they ate, whether dark, milk or white.
Monday, March 26, 2012
Rx: Minimize antibiotics for livestock
Latest news from The PigSite....
Judge Withdraws Approval for Antibiotics in Feed
US - A judge in the US last week issued a landmark ruling that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) must act to limit the overuse of antibiotics in farm animals.The ruling stems from a lawsuit brought last year by a coalition of consumer of advocacy groups suing the FDA over its inaction in addressing the growing public health threat posed by the daily dosing of antibiotics in livestock feed and the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
The lawsuit came on the heels of an FDA report released to Congresswoman Louise Slaughter confirming that 80 per cent of antibiotics are sold for use in agriculture.
"It's about time," said Congresswoman Slaughter.
"The FDA has been dragging its feet on this for 35 years.
"We've all known that this is a public health issue for quite some time. Of course if an animal is sick, it should be treated. But the evidence for ending the daily dosing of antibiotics to otherwise healthy animals is overwhelming.
"I'm pleased to finally see some progress and I can only hope that we see swift action from the FDA on this looming crisis."
In 1977 the FDA proposed withdrawing approval for penicillin and tetracyclines from livestock feed, recognising the danger posed to public health. Since then, the FDA has taken no action to limit its use.
The ruling made on Thursday 22 March last week forces the FDA to withdraw approval for the two classes of antibiotics.
Since 2007, Congresswoman Slaughter has been the author of legislation titled The Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act (PAMTA), designed to ensure that we preserve the effectiveness of antibiotics for the treatment of human disease.
The legislation would prevent the overuse of seven classes of antibiotics, including penicillin and tetracyclines.
"We still have a lot of work to do here," said Congreswoman Slaughter.
"This is a good first step but to really get in front of this problem we must address all classes of antibiotics in farm animals that are important to human health. That's why I will continue to press for passage of PAMTA."
In its decision, the court noted: "Research has shown that the use of antibiotics in livestock leads to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria that can be - and has been - transferred from animals to humans through direct contact, environmental exposure, and the consumption and handling of contaminated meat and poultry products."
The lawsuit came on the heels of an FDA report released to Congresswoman Louise Slaughter confirming that 80 per cent of antibiotics are sold for use in agriculture.
"It's about time," said Congresswoman Slaughter.
"The FDA has been dragging its feet on this for 35 years.
"We've all known that this is a public health issue for quite some time. Of course if an animal is sick, it should be treated. But the evidence for ending the daily dosing of antibiotics to otherwise healthy animals is overwhelming.
"I'm pleased to finally see some progress and I can only hope that we see swift action from the FDA on this looming crisis."
In 1977 the FDA proposed withdrawing approval for penicillin and tetracyclines from livestock feed, recognising the danger posed to public health. Since then, the FDA has taken no action to limit its use.
The ruling made on Thursday 22 March last week forces the FDA to withdraw approval for the two classes of antibiotics.
Since 2007, Congresswoman Slaughter has been the author of legislation titled The Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act (PAMTA), designed to ensure that we preserve the effectiveness of antibiotics for the treatment of human disease.
The legislation would prevent the overuse of seven classes of antibiotics, including penicillin and tetracyclines.
"We still have a lot of work to do here," said Congreswoman Slaughter.
"This is a good first step but to really get in front of this problem we must address all classes of antibiotics in farm animals that are important to human health. That's why I will continue to press for passage of PAMTA."
In its decision, the court noted: "Research has shown that the use of antibiotics in livestock leads to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria that can be - and has been - transferred from animals to humans through direct contact, environmental exposure, and the consumption and handling of contaminated meat and poultry products."
ThePigSite News Desk
Thursday, March 22, 2012
Finally, a good movement
From Josh Freidland at the Food Section
po·ta·to move·ment
po·ta·to move·ment (noun): A practice emerging in Greece whereby municipalities coordinate direct sales of potatoes and other agricultural products from producers to consumers. Consumers benefit from deep discounts over retail prices, and producers benefit by being paid immediately for their goods.
An article in The Guardian described how the potato movement works in practice:
As devised by [agricultural marketing professor Christos] Kamenides and his students, it's a simple system. Their brainwave was to involve Greece's local municipalities, lending the movement a degree of both organisation and official encouragement that it might otherwise have lacked.So: a town hall announces a sale. Locals sign up for what they want to buy. The town hall then tells Kamenides the quantity required and he and his students call local farmers to see who can supply it. They show up with the requisite amount of produce at the appointed place and time, meet their consumers, and the deal is done.
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
You feel like you're gonna die
Excellent article on the increase in gastrointestinal viruses in NYT.
http://goo.gl/JVgPw
Denise Grady writes:
http://goo.gl/JVgPw
Denise Grady writes:
"Deaths from the infections more than doubled from 1999 to 2007, to more than 17,000 a year from 7,000 a year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported. Of those who died, 83 percent were over age 65.
Two thirds of the deaths were caused by a bacterium, Clostridium difficile, which people often contract in hospitals and nursing homes, particularly when they have been taking antibiotics. The bacteria have grown increasingly virulent and resistant to treatment in recent years.
But researchers were surprised to discover that the second leading cause of death from this type of illness was the norovirus. It causes a highly contagious infection, sometimes called winter vomiting illness, that can spread rapidly on cruise ships and in prisons, dormitories and hospitals."
But she misses one area that is going to be BIG problem: schools. The trend toward health-lunch programs is bringing more fresh, uncooked foods into lunchrooms. And kids are getting to self-serve the foods. It's just a matter of time before there's a major story about a school having to deal with an outbreak of norovirus. If you think the coverage of cruise ship outbreaks is bad, wait until it hits home.
When school lunch ladies cooked, food regulations set temperatures that minimized the risks of pathogens. Now, that safety standard has been reduced. What will be interesting is the public policy response to protecting the kids from the virus. The simplest way would be that kids have to wear latex gloves at lunch. Ha, ha, ha. Not going to happen. The response more likely will be new standards and practices requiring some form of hand sanitation -- maybe UV light and ozone combination -- before going to the salad bar. There also will have to be new rules for handling the vomit and other goo if someone gets sick in the cafeteria. It's going to cost a bunch to do and monitor. One option is do nothing since it's rarely fatal to healthy people older then 5 and younger than 65.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)